DEMI Vault — deployed at the demicapsule Vault address, first test passed; v0.3 Simplicity Brief
Skydle · 2026-11-03
UPL-TECH-26-276575-EN
“The DEMI Vault (deployed 3 Nov 2026 at vault.demicapsule.com) stores fingerprint-verified manuscripts with access controlled by shelf labels; v0.3 redesigns the interface to eliminate passwords, tokens and permits from the user's view, replacing them with one-time email login, a drag-and-drop shelf system, and single-button reader actions.”
PropositionsT1: Deployment confirmed at vault.demicapsule.com on 3 November 2026, first end-to-end test passed (fingerprint match, private storage, expiring download link emailed by Claude, byte-identical retrieval) | T2: v0.3 replaces password login with a one-time code sent to the owner's email | T3: Single page 'My Vault' presents all files on four named, coloured shelves: Free, For sale, On request, Private | T4: Shelf assignment is a label only; one physical copy exists and moves between shelves by drag and drop | T5: Per-file owner buttons: download to PC, send a link, open certificate, open public page, open AI package | T6: Whole-folder drop-in supported; registered files auto-recognised and stored in one click | T7: A strongly private store is air-gapped from the web so no AI can access it | T8: Reader view shows author's public shelf with one contextual button per file (download free / buy / ask author / not released) plus a button to continue ideas with an AI | T9: Design reuses conventions from file-sharing services, digital shops and research archives to keep rules invisible
ConstraintsLogin: one-time email code only, no password | Storage: single copy per file, shelf is metadata label not a folder | Private store: no web connectivity permitted | File ingestion: fingerprint must match the Registry before a manuscript is accepted | Access links: must be expiring | Retrieval integrity: byte-for-byte identity required | Scope: v0.3 targets simplicity first; underlying token/permit/fingerprint rules must be preserved but hidden | Environment: web-based, owner and reader interfaces distinct | AI access: blocked entirely for air-gapped private store; permitted only where shelf label allows
MechanismsT1: Re-run end-to-end test: submit a registered manuscript, verify fingerprint check blocks unregistered files, confirm storage, trigger expiring link generation via Claude email, download and diff bytes against original | T2: Trigger login flow, confirm no password field exists, verify one-time code arrives by email, confirm code expires after single use | T3: Render My Vault page, assert exactly four shelves present with correct colour coding and correct file assignments | T4: Drag a file between shelves, confirm single copy in storage, confirm only label metadata changes in database | T5: For a sample file assert all five buttons are present and each opens the correct target without error | T6: Drop a folder containing mixed registered and unregistered files; verify registered files are stored in one click and unregistered are rejected or flagged | T7: Attempt AI or HTTP access to private store endpoint; confirm connection is refused or not exposed | T8: Render reader view; assert one button per file matches shelf label logic; assert AI-continue button present | T9: UX review against file-sharing, shop and archive conventions to confirm no novel terminology is surfaced to the user
BoundariesOut of scope for v0.3: rebuilding or changing the underlying token, permit, fingerprint or Registry logic; changing the expiring-link generation mechanism; altering the byte-integrity or fingerprint-match rules | Not yet built: full simplicity redesign (v0.3 is the stated goal, not a completed deliverable at time of document); details of AI package contents; payment flow for 'buy' button; 'ask the author' request handling; certificate display design | OPEN: What happens when a dropped file's fingerprint is not in the Registry — rejected silently, flagged, or queued? | OPEN: How long do expiring links remain valid, and is duration configurable? | OPEN: Is the air-gapped private store a separate physical or logical deployment? | OPEN: How is the one-time email code invalidated if unused?
Files fingerprinted by this registration
These files were fingerprinted by the registrant and were never uploaded. The registration time above applies to each fingerprint below: a fingerprint cannot be produced without the file it describes. This record does not establish authorship or ownership of the files named.